Hazel Press

Claes Borgström's bill to judicial authorities for 'services rendered' as a representive of Complainant A (SW). Borgström charged £11,640 for what he estimated was 48 hours work. In the request to remove Borgström, SW objected to his interviews with Swedish and international media, calling them a waste of time.

 

The document indicates SW was interrogated on seven separate occasions by the Swedish police. Prosecutor Marianne Ny later told a "Swedish Court that the further statements made by the complainants were materially the same".

 

2010-08-23, Preparation for and visit by Complainant A

 

2010-08-24, Write to lower court regarding appointment as legal representative

 

2010-08-24, Review of complaint from 2010-08-20 with attachments

 

2010-08-24, Review of police memo 2010-08-22

 

2010-08-25, Review of decision of prosecution authority

 

2010-08-25, Review of interrogation 2010-08-26

 

2010-09-01, Review of prosecutor’s decision in petition to reopen case

 

2010-09-01, Review of interrogation 2010-08-30 of Julian Assange

 

2010-09-02, Preparation for and conversation with Complainant A before and after police interrogation and representation during interrogation

 

2010-09-10, Preparation for and conversation with Complainant A before and after police interrogation and representation during interrogation (in my offices)

 

2010-09-10, Visit together with Complainant A to police for conversation with chief investigator and to submit mobile phone

 

2010-09-20, Visit by Complainant A

 

2010-10-11, Preparation for and conversation with Complainant A before and after police interrogation and representation during interrogation

 

2010-10-13, Review mail from Complainant A

 

2010-10-18, Write mail reply to Complainant A

 

2010-10-26, Preparation for and conversation with Complainant A before and after police interrogation

 

2010-10-26, Preparation for representation of Complainant A before and after police interrogation (in my offices)

 

2010-11-18, Review of lower court protocol

 

2010-11-23, Review of detention memo

 

2010-11-24, Review of high court protocol and ruling 2010-11-24

 

2010-11-26, Review of prosecutor’s letter to lower court 2010-11-25

 

2011-01-10, Review of City of Westminster’s Magistrate’s Court’s ‘Provisional Skeleton Argument on Behalf of Mr Assange’

 

2011-01-11, Review of mail from Complainant A

 

2011-01-23, Review of mail from Complainant A

 

2011-02-01, Preparation for and visit by Complainant A

 

2011-02-23, Review of mail from Complainant A

 

2011-02-24, Review of City of Westminster Magistrate’s Court ‘Procedural Background and The Evidence’

 

2011-03-07, Preparations for and visit by Complainant A

 

2011-03-07, Representation of Complainant A at police interrogation

 

2011-04-27, Conversation with Complainant A before and after police interrogation

 

2011-04-27, Preparations for and representation of Complainant A for police interrogation

 

2011-07-18, Review of mail with Thomas Hammarberg regarding amicable settlement with Julian Assange

 

2011-07-25, Mail to Helena Kennedy regarding amicable settlement with Julian Assange

 

2011-08-15, Preparations for and representation at police interrogation with Complainant A

 

2011-09-20, Preparations for and visit by Complainant A

 

2011-11-02, Review of decision of UK High Court

 

2011-11-21, Review of mail from attorney Per E Samuelson to Marianne Ny

 

2011-11-22, Review of mail from Marianne Ny to attorney Thomas Olsson

 

2011-11-23, Review of mail from Marianne Ny

 

2011-11-24, Review of mail from Per E Samuelson to Marianne Ny

 

2011-11-28, Conference with prosecutors and defendant at offices of Per E Samuelson regarding continuation of case

 

2012-03-26, Review of mail from Complainant A

 

2012-05-30, Review of ruling of UK Supreme Court, press summary, case details, and application to reopen appeal

 

2013-03-06, Review of lower court petition regarding Complainant A

 

2013-03-07, Reply to lower court petition regarding Complainant A

 

 

From an article posted by 'Assange in Sweden'.

Complainant A no longer requires Claes Borgström